THE BIG LIST: 8 Times Our Federal Government Orchestrated ‘Protection’ Racket For Bidens

(Liberty Bell) – A new report has revealed that for years now, the federal government has quietly been operating a racket to help provide protection for President Joe Biden. However, while this has been going on for a long time now, the general public has only recently been made aware of the depths that federal law enforcement agencies and the officials who run them are willing to go in order to help keep the Biden family’s secrets buried.

The Federalist has crafted a piece that reveals eight distinct times the government has helped to protect Biden.

The most famous of the recent protection schemes headed up by the government to benefit their boy Biden is the censorship and suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop story, which was first published by the New York Post just a few days before the 2020 presidential election.

A batch of Twitter Files released by new CEO Elon Musk made it public knowledge that the Federal Bureau of Investigation was meeting with social media companies and warning them that a major story involving Joe Biden’s son was coming on the horizon and that it was Russian disinformation so they should probably suppress it and not allow it to be spread around.

Yes, that’s right. The FBI, a government agency, lied to social media companies in order to get them to censor this story and limit a person’s freedom of speech. This is egregious. Why were they so threatened by this laptop? Probably because the laptop contains information that proves former Vice President Biden was working with his son Hunter to sell political access to his office to businesses in foreign countries, including China. This is not exactly the kind of information you want circulating about yourself in dark alleys.

“Before the New York Post broke the story on Oct. 14, 2022, about Joe Biden’s knowledge of and potential involvement in his son’s business dealings, the FBI warned Facebook that it ‘should be on high alert.’ ‘[W]e thought there was a lot of Russian propaganda in the 2016 election,’ the FBI said, adding that ‘we have it on notice that basically there’s about to be some kind of dump similar to that so just be vigilant.'”

Based on the FBI warning, Mark Zuckerberg, the founder of Facebook, went on to explain that “when the New York Post broke the Hunter Biden laptop story on Oct. 14, 2020, Facebook treated the story as potentially misinformation, important misinformation for five to seven days while the tech giant’s team could determine whether it was false.”

“Federal law enforcement agencies likewise warned Twitter in the lead-up to the 2020 general election ‘that they expected ‘hack-and-leak operations’ by state actors might occur in the period shortly before the 2020 presidential election, likely in October.’ Twitter’s then-head of trust and safety, Yoel Roth, further acknowledged that in meetings with federal law enforcement agencies, he learned ‘that there were rumors that a hack-and-leak operation would involve Hunter Biden,'” the Federalist wrote.

“According to a letter Twitter’s lawyer sent to the Federal Election Commission, the tech giant explained it was “the prior warnings of a hack-and-leak operation and doubts about the provenance of the materials republished in the N.Y. Post articles,’ that led its Site Integrity Team to preliminarily determine “the materials could have been obtained through hacking,'” it continued.

Now we know that the Hunter Biden laptop was not at all part of some “hack-and-leak operation,” nor was it Russian propaganda or misinformation. And the FBI knew that as well because they seized the laptop from the computer repair store where it was abandoned almost a year prior. And despite the facts, the FBI deceived the tech giants in an attempt to induce them to suppress the story that most likely would have resulted in Joe Biden losing the election and Trump serving a second term.

Another example of the protection racket is how the FBI seized Hunter’s laptop from the repair shop without making a peep.

“While it was the FBI’s lies that prompted the tech giants to censor the New York Post’s coverage of the Biden family pay-to-play scandal, the bureau’s efforts to protect the Biden family from the damning material contained on the laptop may have also included the FBI’s seizure of the laptop from the repair store owner, John Paul Mac Isaac. Had Mac Isaac not made a copy of the hard drive before the FBI seized Hunter’s laptop in December 2019, the FBI could have kept the entire story quiet. One can’t help but wonder if the bureau’s true motivation in seizing the laptop was to protect the Biden family,” The Federalist said.

A comment was made by one of the bureau’s agents who seized the laptop that suggested what the motive might have been. When Mac Isaac kidded around with the agents who were picking up the computer, he said he’d be sure to change the names of those involved before he wrote the book concerning the situation. One agent then replied, “It is our experience that nothing ever happens to people that don’t talk about these things.”

Rather ominous, right?

Then there’s the seizure and subsequent return of Hunter’s second laptop.

“Another Biden-clean-up mission may have taken place two months later when, in February 2020, the Drug Enforcement Administration raided the office of Hunter Biden’s former psychiatrist, Keith Ablow. In executing the search warrant, the DEA seized from Ablow’s safe a second laptop that belonged to Hunter. Even though Hunter was under investigation at the time, the government returned the laptop to his lawyer,” The Federalist reported.

The story then reveals that at the time of the DEA search, there was no mention made concerning the Hunter Biden laptop. Instead, what little public coverage was provided of the raid was all about how the DEA claimed the execution of a search warrant as part of an “ongoing investigation” and references made to Ablow’s medical license being recovered in May of 2019 over alleged “inappropriate sexual activity with patients and illegally giving prescriptions to employees.”

“That the DEA waited nine months before searching Ablow’s office for evidence and that the government never charged Ablow for any crimes seems rather suspect, especially given the raid only followed the FBI’s seizure of Hunter Biden’s first laptop. But even if there were nothing nefarious about the raid, returning the laptop, while Hunter Biden remained under federal investigation, fits the pattern of the feds protecting the Biden family,” Margot Cleveland wrote for The Federalist.

Officials have also downplayed or just flat out ignored intelligence threats in order to provide Biden with plausible deniability.

“The Delaware laptop contained hordes of compromising information on both Hunter Biden and his father. Beyond that scandalous material, the laptop also included another significant revelation: that Hunter Biden believed the Russians had stolen another laptop that contained material ripe for blackmailing the Biden family,” Cleveland noted.

According to a video that Mac Isaac confirmed was on the laptop, the younger son of Joe Biden recalled the incident when the laptop was boosted. Hunter talks about how he almost overdosed on drugs in the summer of 2018 while he was living the high life in Las Vegas with his drug dealer and two other individuals. A 35-year-old “brunette” Russian was also present. Not long after he came to, Hunter discovered his laptop was missing.

“I think he’s the one that stole my computer,” Hunter can be heard on the tape saying. “I think the three of them, the three guys that were like a little group. The dealer and his two guys, I took them everywhere,” Hunter continued. “They have videos of me doing this. They have videos of me doing crazy f-cking sex, f-cking, you know,” the president’s son added. “My computer, I had taken tons of like, just left like that cam on,” Hunter continued, “and somebody stole it during that period of time.”

When he was asked if he was worried that Russian thieves might try to blackmail him with material on the computer, he said yes.

Cleveland then writes, “It is difficult to overstate the national security risk that would exist if the Russians had possession of a laptop filled with not just personal information about Hunter Biden, but communications implicating his father in a pay-to-play scandal. And the FBI, had it properly processed the laptop upon subpoenaing it from Mac Isaac, would have known of that risk and, at a minimum, provided Joe Biden a defensive briefing.”

Whistleblowers have revealed that the FBI told employees not to look at the Hunter Biden laptop, saying they were to avoid interfering with the 2020 presidential election.

The government also ran sham investigations and sought to keep certain bits of information buried.

“According to Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, ‘multiple FBI whistleblowers, including those in senior positions’” raised ‘the alarm about tampering by senior FBI and Justice Department officials in politically sensitive investigations,’ including ‘investigative activity involving derogatory information on Hunter Biden’s financial and foreign business activities.’ Grassley alleged that the whistleblowers claimed Washington Field Office Assistant Special Agent in Charge Timothy ‘Thibault and other FBI officials sought to falsely portray as disinformation evidence acquired from multiple sources that provided the FBI derogatory information related to Hunter Biden’s financial and foreign business activities, even though some of that information had already been or could be verified,'” Cleveland noted.

A news released that was published by Grassley’s officer also claimed, “in August of 2020, FBI supervisory intelligence analyst Brian Auten opened an assessment, which was used by a team of agents at FBI headquarters to improperly discredit and falsely claim that derogatory information about Biden’s activities was disinformation, causing investigative activity and sourcing to be shut down.”

“The FBI headquarters team allegedly placed their assessment findings in a restricted access subfolder, effectively flagging sources and derogatory evidence related to Hunter Biden as disinformation while shielding the justification for such findings from scrutiny,” Grassley stated.

Federal officials also stepped in when Hunter Biden’s gun went missing.

Back in October 2018, Hunter Biden bought a firearm, going on to complete a “Firearms Transaction Record” that reveals he responded “no” to a question contained on the form that asked, “Are you an unlawful user of, or addicted to, marijuana or any depressant, stimulant, narcotic drug, or any other controlled substance?”

What’s really odd here is that Hunter clearly lied on the form, which is an actual crime, because just about everyone knows that the president’s son has struggled with drug problems for a very long time. It’s well documented on video. And yet, he has not had charges pressed against him? That’s just weird, right?

“According to Politico, on Oct. 23, 2018, Hallie Biden, Hunter’s sister-in-law-turned-lover, removed ‘Hunter’s gun and threw it in a trash can behind a grocery store, only to return later to find it gone.’ After the manager of the grocery store called police, who launched an investigation, ‘a curious thing happened,” as Politico put it: ‘Secret Service agents approached the owner of the store where Hunter bought the gun and asked to take the paperwork involving the sale…'”

“The gun store owner refused to supply the paperwork, suspecting that the Secret Service officers wanted to hide Hunter’s ownership of the missing gun in case it were to be involved in a crime,” Politico’s sources revealed. The store owner later gave a copy of the paper to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives.

Hunter isn’t the only member of the family to get protection from government officials. They also got involved when Ashley Biden’s diary was taken.

“While the investigation into Hunter’s missing gun and the potentially fraudulent representation he made on the Firearm Transaction Record ended without charges, the Department of Justice brought federal charges against two individuals who attempted to sell a diary reportedly belonging to Ashley Biden. And not only did the government come down heavy on those individuals, but the FBI also raided the home and office of Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe,” Cleveland stated in the story.

O’Keefe went on to say, “the diary was allegedly abandoned in a room that [Ashley Biden] had stayed at” and the two individuals who discovered the diary approached Project Veritas and other media outlets to sell the book. “Project Veritas gave the diary to law enforcement to ensure it could be returned to its rightful owner. We never published it.”

“Now, Ms. Biden’s father’s Department of Justice, specifically the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York, appears to be investigating the situation, claiming the diary was stolen. We don’t know if it was but it begs the question: In what world is the alleged theft of a diary investigated by the President’s FBI and his Department of Justice? A diary?” O’Keefe questioned.

Not only did the Justice Department raid O’Keefe’s home, but they also got “secret warrants, orders, and a subpoena” over the course of 16 months in order to maintain “‘unchecked’ and ‘unfettered’ access to the emails and contacts of Founder and CEO James O’Keefe and seven other staff members.”

Project Veritas has stated that they believe the government was purposefully targeting O’Keefe and his colleagues because of their “news-gathering activities surrounding allegations against then-candidate, Joe Biden, made by his daughter, Ashley Biden, in her diary.”

And finally, Cleveland points out, “Attorney General Merrick Garland represents the final and biggest protector of the Biden family, with the investigation into Hunter Biden continuing under the oversight of the Biden administration’s Department of Justice. Similarly, the DOJ, through the Western District of Pennsylvania’s U.S. Attorney’s Office, ‘is still overseeing the criminal investigation into the bankrupt health care business from which James Biden allegedly siphoned hundreds of thousands of dollars to finance repairs to his beach house.'”

Aside from the conflict of interest, Garland has essentially ignored all the calls made by congressional leaders to appoint a special counsel in order to look into the financial dealings of the Biden family. Rather than do that, Garland appointed Jack Smith as special counsel to launch an investigation into Trump. Classic redirect, right?

Clearly, the government is working hard to prevent the dirt that exists on the Biden family from seeing the light of day. These deeds done in the dark must be dragged into the light. And once it is, those who engaged in not only the corruption of the Bidens, but assisted in burying it, need to be held accountable.

Copyright 2022.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here